1) should 2) can 3) has to or must :) 4) should 5) not able я думаю 6) чето не врубился в смысл его мб will be able to get 7) must 8) may 9) have to 10)must
Arter World War II villages and towns turned into big cities quickly. That's why in 1955 cities were surrounded by "Green Belts", zones of land without buildings. But despite the ban thousand of square kilometres are disappearing each year to build new houses, airports etc.
Should Green Belts continue to be protected?
Yes: noone wants to see England's historic towns and countrysider eaten by urban sprawl;
green open spaces enriches people's lives;
Green Belts provide opportunity for outdoor activities;
the trees and plants clean air pollution.
No: England has a huge housing shortage, and Green Belts occupy the area which can be used for building houses;
some Green Belts are unattractive;
because of Green Belts people have to make very long journeys every day to work;
Green Belts aren't necessary because there are national parks and nature reserves.
Notice-board
доска объявлений
1) What are you do tonight? 2 Are you stays at your friend's housr this weekend? 3 Are your grand parents lives with you?
4 Are your teacher gave you a lot of homework? 5 Are your school offered after school activities? 6 How long are you studied English for? 7 Are you thinked about learning a new foreign language? 8 Are you meet a pop star?
Это приглашение на день рождение