1.in august
2.at Summer School in Scotland
3.<span>in the morning we spent 3 hours learning English. In the lessons we read and discussed texts, learned English poems by heart, played games, asked and answered questions, learned new words, used the computer and wrote our own fairy tales.
4.now,they speak and read English better,than we did last year
5.no,because she wasn't in
6.yes
7.yes,of course
8.i think,that it helps me to improve my English,because it's interesting and helpful for studying Foreign language</span>
1). Is he a pupil?
2). Does he like her pupils?
3). Does he want to be her pupil?
4). Is her pupil from Africa?
5). Is her pupil in Africa?
6). Does her pupil like Africa?
7). Does her pupil want to go to Africa?
8). Is it your kitten?
9). Is your kitten little?
10). Does your kitten like little toys?
Ответ:
1. boring
2. fantastic
3. educational
4. awful
5. silly
Объяснение:
1. Чуть не заснул во время фильма! Это было так скучно
2. Эта полицейская драма фантастическая. Актерская игра-это высшее качество, как и сюжетные линии.
3. Я нахожу эти документальные фильмы о природе очень познавательными. Я всегда многому у них учусь.
4. Эта комедия ужасная. Это не смешно и актерская игра очень плохая.
5. Я нашел комедийное шоу тоже глупое. Шутки были смешные и детские.
Cause, always, speak, ask, not, overhear, already
Problems with textbooks exist in every country. In Saudi Arabia, it is too nationalistic mood on the pages of textbooks. These installations are so strong that cause concern(может лучше problems вместо concern) with the USA. In Hong Kong there is another problem. The Chinese Government wanted to introduce a new curriculum "national education". They wanted to delete the negative aspects of history of the country. Social movement prevented them to perform it. Also, textbooks of Japan underwent to criticism. In France there is a problem of economic education. In America there is a set of problems: sexual education, origin of the universe, religion, political views.