Education is one of the holiest occupations in my view. I disagree with that teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Although teachers are important for students, the most important part for learning knowledge is students themselves.
Different teachers has different style, so it is hard to evaluate how well each teacher teaches according to how much students learn. As nobody would have the same character, teachers also have their own teaching styles such as humorous, gentle, strict, to name a few. Maybe some students like humorous teachers, while others prefer a gentle one. But probably the students of a strict teacher could give good results in their study, even though these teachers teach the same thing. We could not say that the strict teacher should be paid higher than the gentle teacher, since we know that the students have learned more because they were afraid.
On the other hand, how much or how well students learn depends on students themselves. In a school, it is easy to see that some students are with high marks, while some others have lower marks. A teacher is a person who direct students how to learn. Students should do much more works. The more attention students pay, the more knowledge they learn. The hard-workers probably get higher scores. Students" learning results depend on individual students" intellectual abilities and the time and energy that they put into learning. Sometimes it has nothing to do what how well the teachers taught. In addition, knowledge that students learn not only comes from the teachers, but also from many sources. Family influence, extracurricular reading and out-class teaching are some of the sources that can provide students with knowledge.
In sum, although teachers are important in students" education and learning, there are many other factors that decide how well students" learn. So it is unfair that teachers are paid according to how much their students learn.
What magazine are your dead reading now?
1. Паула полностью забыла предупреждение своей подруги. Буква c.
2. Полицейский прочитал подозреваемому его права. Буква b.
3. Этот осведомитель (информатор) всегда дает ценную информацию. Буква а.
1. Люди равны перед законом. Are - Present Simple, Active, инфинитив - to be.
2. Команда будет пересекать американский континент две-три недели. will be crossing - Future Progressive(Continuous), Active voice; to cross.
3. Королева откроет новое заседание парламента. will open - Future Simple, Active voice. to open.
4. Там(в мире) не было денег, чтобы финансировать новые программы по предотвращению преступлений. was - Past Simple, Active voice. to be.
5. Гангстер ищет адвоката в настоящее время. is looking - Present Progressive(Continuous), Active. to look;
6. Свидетельница принимала её клятву в тот момент, когда мы вошли. was taking - Past Progressive(Continuous), Active. to take. <span>
</span>
1.<span>I like </span>reading<span> books
2.</span>Swimming<span> is a good exercise.
3.</span>Не likes<span> inviting</span><span> his friends to his house.
</span>4. <span>This dress wants<span> washing</span>.
</span>5. <span>I like his method of </span>teaching<span>.</span><span>
</span>
"Тач ё хэд, тач ё ноуз, тач ё иэз, тач ё тоуз". Наверное не yump, а jump, тогда "Джамп энд ран. Летс хэр фан! Уош ё фэйс. Уош ё хэндз. Клин ё тис. Стэй хэлси, плиз"